Venus and Mercury mingle with the radiance of the sun and free themselves

An example of anthropomorphic language in scientific writing:

"But Venus and Mercury rise and set in a different fashion. For they are not occulted by the approach of the sun, as the higher planets are; and they are not uncovered again by its departure. But, coming in front, they mingle with the radiance of the sun and free themselves. But when the higher planets have an evening rising and a morning setting, they are not obscured at any time so as not to traverse the night with their illumination, but the lower planets remain hidden indifferently from sunset to sunrise and cannot be seen anywhere."

Nicolaus Copernicus (1543/1995) On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres (Translator: Charles Glenn Wallis) Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books

The phrasing here suggests Venus and Mercury as active agents. Similarly the idea they hide 'indifferently' is metaphorical, or otherwise suggests the planets are capable of being other than indifferent, and caring about their status!

Read about anthropomorphism

Read examples of anthropomorphism in science

sun is a lantern which is the lamp of a very beautiful temple

An example of the use of metaphor and simile in scientific writing:

"In the centre of all rests the sun. For who would place this lamp of a very beautiful temple in another or better place than this wherefrom it can illuminate everything at the same time? As a matter of fact, not unhappily do some call it the lantern, others, the mind and still others, the pilot of the world. Trismegistus calls it a 'visible god'; Sophocles' Electra, 'that which gazes upon all things'. And so the sun, as if resting on a kingly throne, governs the family of stars which wheel around."

Nicolaus Copernicus (1543/1995) On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres (Translator: Charles Glenn Wallis) Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books

Read about similes in science

Read about examples of science similes

distance of earth from the centre of the cosmos is as a few atoms of a visible body

An example of an analogy used in scientific argument,

"…since the minimal and indivisible corpuscles, which are called atoms, are not perceptible to sense, they do not, when taken in twos or in some small number, constitute a visible body; but they can be taken in such a large quantity that there will at last be enough to form a visible magnitude. So it is as regards the place of the earth; for although it is not at the centre of the world, nevertheless the distance is as nothing, particularly in comparison with the sphere of the fixed stars."

Nicolaus Copernicus (1543/1995) On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres (Translator: Charles Glenn Wallis) Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books

Copernicus argued against the widely held traditional idea that the earth was at the very centre of the universe (a notion that no longer has a clear scientific meaning today), suggesting the true centre was near the sun (around which he claimed the earth moved). However, he tries to suggest that the distance of the earth from the world's centre was so small compared with the scale of the cosmos that it should be treated as in effect 'nothing'.

Read about analogy in science

Read examples of scientific analogies

Copernicus, Nicolaus

Nicolaus Copernicus (1473 – 1543) was a Polish church canon who is most famous for writing De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres) a book that argued that the cosmos was better understood if the Sun was at the centre of the universe rather than the earth.

Although a churchman, Copernicus was never a priest, and was largely an administrator and diplomat, who had studied medicine and also acted as a physician when needed. His work as an astronomer would not have seemed out of place as astronomical observations were very important in organising the calendar which was a major concern of the Church.

The idea that the Earth moved through space and revolved around the Sun with the other planets was revolutionary, and also contradicted Catholic Church teaching. When De revolutionibus was eventually published in 1543 (the story is that Copernicus received one of the first copies on his deathbed) it included an anonymous preface which had been inserted by a colleague (Andreas Osiander) to the effect that the model descried by Copernicus should not be understood as intended to be a realistic account but rather should be seen as a hypothetical model which might prove useful (although Copernicus's model included many of the complications of the existing geocentric theory as he held to the assumption that heavenly bodies would move in perfect circles – so complex systems of circles within circles, or circles moving eccentrically, were still needed to fit observations).

The Church did not seek to censor or ban the book for some decades – although it was eventually put on the 'Index' of Prohibited books until some 'corrections' had been made by the censor. This change of attitude was likely due to the attention brought to the book by later champions of heliocentrism. In particular, Galileo Galilei's famous trial and conviction by the Church inquisition was based on the charge that in his teaching and writings he did not limit himself to presenting the Copernicus model as a theoretical notion. Galileo claimed at his trial that he had never actually held or taught the heliocentric account as being true, even if he had given that impression – but it is very hard to read some of his work as anything but a strong argument for the reality of the Earth's movement around the Sun!

While Copernicus's model was in many ways as unwieldy as the existing model due to Ptolemy that had been the conventional view for centuries, it provided the basis for Johannes Kepler's later work in which he (eventually, with some reluctance) replaced circles within circles within circles by elliptical orbits which much more readily fitted observations of planetary motion.

heavenly bodies naturally revolve because they are spherical

An example of a historical scientific notion

"If one asked Copernicus why the earth and the heavenly bodies moved, he would answer: Because they were spherical or because they were attached to spherical orbs. Put a sphere anywhere in space and it would naturally revolve – it would turn without needing anybody to turn it because it was the very nature of the sphere to rotate in this way."

Herbert Butterfield (1957) The Origins of Modern Science 1300-1800 (New Edition: Revised and enlarged). G. Bell and Sons Ltd., London.

Nicolaus Copernicus is rightly remembered a major figure in the history of science because of his championing of the heliocentric model (planets moving around the sun) as opposed to the widely accepted geocentric model (the earth is at the centre of the universe, and everything else rotates around it). However, in many ways his idea reflected ancient and medieval ideas (such as here, that the movement of the heavenly bodies is 'natural' and does not needs to be explained in terms of forces) that are now recognised to be alternative conceptions. (The major shift in thinking associated with, and starting with, Copernicus was continued and developed in parts by others such as Kepler, Galileo and Newton).