Hoaxing the post-truth journals

Is Rahul Hajare the Alan Sokal for the Open Access era?: Part 1

Keith S. Taber

…the editors of the Journal of Gastrointestinal Disorders and Liver function had no reservations about publishing a paper supposedly about 'over sexuality' which was actually an extended argument about the terrible threat to our freedoms of…IQ scores. That this makes no sense at all, is just as obvious as that it has absolutely nothing to do with gastrointestinal disorders and liver function!

Rahul Hajare is a much published academic who has written widely on topics related to aspects of health (especially sexual health) and behaviour but encompassing social issues (the treatment of old cows in India) and issues of personal freedom (the risks of facial recognition technology and IQ testing). In another posting, I have discussed in some detail an article which seems to suggest cancer is divine justice for sinning, and discusses a study which looks for improvement in liver disease among healthy people (!) subject to different work flow regimes. A lot of his writing seems initially to be nonsensical and fantastic – at least until one gets the 'jokes'.

He seems to be hoaxing open access journals 1 that will publish for a price regardless of the quality of scholarship by seeing just how bizarre, and incoherent, and irrelevant, one can get before a journal looking for an author to pay a publication fee will 'draw the line' and reject nonsensical text and unsubstantiated claims. Based on Hajare's project, that line is sometimes drawn very low.

Why admire a hoaxer?

Should we admire someone who produces copious publications that are clearly of low quality, contain wild claims, obvious non sequiturs, and garbled text?

Normally, the answer would be obvious. But what if the author is testing out just how banal, illogical, and incoherent a manuscript needs to be before a predatory journal (a periodical pretending to be a serious research journal in order to charge authors for publishing their work) feels it cannot publish it. I think this is what Dr Rahul Hajare has been doing. And the results of his project should worry us all.

The Sokal affair

This reminds me of the Sokal hoax. Alan Sokal was a physicist who was so convinced that a lot of post-modern cultural studies literature was actually devoid of content and just consisted of flowery and impressive sounding rhetoric, that he wrote a paper about the 'hermeneutics of quantum gravity' (Sokal, 1996) which was published in a research journal despite Sokal himself believing it no had merits as an academic argument.

Sokal did a good job of adopting the literary style of much scholarship in the area he was lampooning, and some might claim he did too good a job and, without realising it, actually offered a meaningful account of some of the challenges in understanding the fundamental meanings of modern physics. Even a final flurry claiming that a 'liberatory science' would need a 'profound revision of the canon of mathematics' (p.26) was well enough contextualised to be read as a serious suggestion.

Sokal's hoax can be seen as part of the culture/science wars, which relate to such questions as the special nature of science and whether it offers us an account of reality which has more validity than alternative options (religions, philosophical systems, magic, astrology, homeopathy…). 2 He thought that the authors and editors of journals such as Social Text did not apply the kind of critical thinking that is able to scrutinise an argument and recognise obviously flawed conclusions or analogies. However, I do not think he considered most of the academics concerned to be deliberately producing and publishing nonsense, rather just unable to see that the Emperor's new clothes offered nothing to protect their intellectual modesty.

Post-truth journals

There is a much more serious problem today: one that I have written about a lot in this blog. This is the large number of journals that publish nonsense not because they have not spotted that it is nonsense, but because they have not even checked to find out. They have not been taken in by flowery language, but by imprecise, ungrammatical, incomplete texts – or rather, not actually taken in, as they are simply not concerned. Perhaps they would rather not notice it is nonsense – although perhaps, more to the point, it is irrelevant to their business models.

Articles that are incoherent, poorly argued, illogical, counter to accepted wisdom, counter to common sense, and even blatantly counterfactual, bring in publication fees as well as any others. Indeed, authors of such poor quality work are more likely to be keen to pay such fees, as they would likely have found that competent research journals have no interest in publishing their work. These predatory journals sometimes even publish, word for word, material already published elsewhere (where genuine research journals actively avoid this). After all, if an author is foolish enough to pay several journals for publishing the same work then a re-publication is just as profitable as an original piece.

None of this would really matter if it was obvious which journals are spurious – but these predatory journals have titles similar to (sometimes almost copying) real research journals, claim to have serious academics editing them, claim to use rigorous peer review, claim they only want high quality original work, et cetera. And, of course, often serious scholars will submit their work in good faith to a dodgy journal and get it published. Some of these studies may be sound, even if the work was not tested, and therefore potentially strengthened, by genuine peer review.

So, a predatory journal may contain a lot of nonsense, but clearly not everything that reaches a very low standard will be of a very low standard. (For example, even I could jump the high jump if the bar was set at 0.5m – but, of course, so could the world champion. )

When an expert in a relevant field looks at one of these journals it soon become clear that much of their content cannot be relied upon – but as these journals are open access they can be read by any member of the public such as

  • children researching their science homework,
  • students researching topics,
  • ill people looking for medical advice,

as well people looking for scientific backing to

  • support belief in
    • alien abductions, or in
    • dangers of vaccination, or
  • to support denial of canonical scientific thinking:
    • to deny climate change, etc.

An academic's publication list may have a large number of articles in journals with very respectable-sounding title, indeed sometimes titles VERY similar to those of well-established, reputable journals.  Would a potential employer or funder more likely hire or give a grant to the person with 12 research publications or the other applicant with 34 – if not equipped to spot that the longer list was made up of work of little merit?

Like many academics I get many invitations to send work to journals I have never heard of, across a great range of scholarly fields (regardless of my lack of qualifications in most of those fields), and I have sometimes been tempted to reply to an invitation to send in something, even just a two page article (a common ploy is to invite something this brief), before next week's deadline. It would not be difficult to test the claims of 'peer review' by writing something superficially scholarly but of no substantive intellectual content, to see if it was accepted. (What then? Do I want to put a worthless article out there under my name? Do I wish to part with hundreds of pounds just for the sake of proving the point?)

Anyway, I no longer need to consider this, as the work has been done. I think Dr Hajare has been showing up these journals for a while now.

Dr Rahul Hajare, who claims to be a fellow at the Indian Council of Medical Research, has quite a long publications list. From the titles, some of these publications seem to be serious scientific studies. However, many appear to be spoofs. Indeed Dr Hajare seems to have been playing a game of deliberately leaving clues that should be picked up with the most cursory editorial attention: the kinds of clues that should tell any reasonably informed reader not to take the work too seriously. Despite peppering his work with such hints, it still keeps getting published.

Convoluted titles

I first came across the Hajare hoax when I was invited to submit a medical article to a journal about petroleum. I had a look at what had been published, and found some examples of articles which seemed to have nothing to do with petroleum. One of these was "An attempt to Characterize Street Pharmaceutical Teachers Abusing Drugs and Aspect of Allergy Among Adult Men Attending Long Distance Institutions in Pune, India".

Characterising Street Pharmaceutical Teachers Abusing Drugs
An article published in Petroleum and Chemical Industry International that was submitted on 23rd September 2018

What immediately struck me as most odd was that there seemed to be two very different things going in the title here:

  • Characterising Street Pharmaceutical Teachers Abusing Drugs
  • Aspects of Allergy Among Adult Men Attending Long Distance Institutions
So, how were these two themes linked?

Well, of course, they were not. The 'research article' did not discuss allergies. Indeed the ONLY reference to allergy in the paper was in the title. This seems to be one type of 'reveal' or 'giveaway' signal that Hajare will use, presumably to signify to anyone paying attention that the article is a hoax.

My initial reaction, however, was that perhaps this was some unfortunate production error, and the title of a completely different paper had been appended by mistake. So, I tried searching for the missing paper, instead found more of Hajare's output… and it was then I started to realise that Dr Hajare seemed to be a serial hoaxer.

It seems unlikely that the odd title was a journal error, when the same article has been published with the same title elsewhere:

An article published in Current Trends in Gastroenterology and Hepatology that was submitted on 25th September 2018 (two days after it was also submitted to Petroleum and Chemical Industry International)
An article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Current Research that was submitted on 27th September 2018 (two days after it was also submitted to Current Trends in Gastroenterology and Hepatology and four days after it was submitted to Petroleum and Chemical Industry International)
Dodgy definitions: teaching staff and van drivers

Hajare's study helpfully defined what he meant by 'street teachers'. (What did you think this term would mean, dear reader?)

"Street Teaching Staffs: any person (27 to 47 years) who spends majority of his time in car parks sometimes working or roaming; and have limited or no contact with a family and spend both days and nights in the car parks without returning to a family or a guardian."

p.2 (Emphasis added)

Hm. If we take this at face value the study sample would have excluded any 'street teacher' who spends their time teaching children on the streets (rather than in car parks) or who is 25 years old, or who has a home to go to at the end of the day. Are there really substantial numbers of people employed as teachers who might fit this definition?

Another term in this study was 'commercial van [sic, not bus or coach] driver', which was defined for this study (for some reason) as:

"Commercial Van Driver: any male person who control operation and movement of a motorized vehicle for transporting more than nine persons including himself on public road for payment and for a distance not more than 90 kilometers"

p.2 (Emphasis added)

What Hajare seems to be doing here is mimicking the way everyday terms need to be operationally defined in research – but in an absurdist way.

Some of his other productions offer similar kaleidoscopes of words masquerading as titles.

Facial Recognition Technology and Detection of Over Sexuality…

The journal Advanced Research in Gastroenterology & Hepatology was happy to publish work under the title "Facial Recognition Technology and Detection of Over Sexuality in Private Organizations Combined with Shelter House. Baseline Integrated Behavioural and Biological Assessment among Most at-Risk Low Standards Hope Less Institutions in Pune, India". What any of this might have to do with gastroenterology or hepatology is anyone's guess: not bothering to even offer some tenuous linkage to a journal's supposed scope seems to be part of the way Hajare metaphorically winks at his readership so they will share in the joke.

😉

Putting the clues up front

One type of spoof is written in such a way that it starts off being largely credible and gradually moves to the more obscure? The reader experiences a gradual realisation that they have been fooled. That can be clever – but is dangerous when hoaxing academic work, as someone dipping into the work may not read that far in.

Hajare, however, often uses techniques to warn readers up front about his intentions – such as including unrelated and irrelevant themes in his titles, the use of absurd statements in the abstract or executive summary or opening lines of an article. This particular article begins with an Executive Summary:

When this[*] occurs the over sexuality cells can travel away from the original sexuality and create more sexuality attraction when they settle and grow in a different part of the body. Any type of over sexuality can spread. This depends on several factors which include: The type of human, How aggressive it is, The duration one has had it before culture, Its environment, Its colour, Chronic inflammation, Modified sex signalling, Secretion of Connective Tissue-Dissolving Enzymes, Selection of food with colonial mind set. The following approaches will help prevent the formation, growth and spread of over sexuality in working place.

p.0050 [* n.b., no subject has yet been introduced!]

It is very hard to see how anyone reading about how 'over sexuality cells' move away from the 'original sexuality' is going to think this is a serious contribution to science. In case there is any doubt, we are told how the mobility of 'over sexuality' depends on a range of factors such as its colour (what colours does 'sexuality' come in?) and food tastes.

So what is wrong with facial recognition technology – and IQ testing for that matter?

In the main text Hajare constructs a detailed account of the uses, and in particular what he sees as the potential misuses, of facial recognition technology. 3 This seems at face value [no pun intended] to be a seriously held viewpoint (albeit having no connection with the 'over sexuality' theme of the Executive Summary)

However, this seems less likely when one notices another of his publications in the Journal of Gastrointestinal Disorders and Liver function entitled "Detection of Progression over Sexuality in Indian Students and Teachers Combined". This repeats, virtually word for word, the same executive summary (except we now have 'acceptance sexuality cells' moving around the body).

This article, submitted to that journal on September 9th 2018 (about a fortnight before the 'facial recognition technology' article was submitted) offers virtually the same argument. The key differences is whereas in Advanced Research in Gastroenterology & Hepatology it is facial recognition technology which is the great menace, in the earlier submission to the Journal of Gastrointestinal Disorders and Liver function the target had been IQ scores:

Text [emphasis added] from Journal of Gastrointestinal Disorders and Liver functionText from Advanced Research in Gastroenterology & Hepatology
With such a grave threat to privacy and civil liberties, measured regulation should be abandoned in favour of an outright ban. The species would have loved IQ score. It is easy to accept an outwardly compelling but ultimately illusory view about what the future will look like once the full potential of IQ score is unlocked. From this perspective, will never have to meet a stranger, fuss with passwords and unreal people, or worry about forgetting wallet …With such a grave threat to privacy and civil liberties, measured regulation should be abandoned in favor of an outright ban. The species would have loved facial recognition technology. It is easy to accept an outwardly compelling but ultimately illusory view about what the future will look like once the full potential of facial recognition technology is unlocked. From this perspective, will never have to meet a stranger, fuss with passwords and unreal people, or worry about forgetting wallet. …
…We [sic] believe IQ score is the most uniquely dangerous surveillance mechanism ever invented. Tempted by this vision, people will continue to invite IQ score into colleges, homes and onto their devices, allowing it to play symmetrical role in ever more aspects of their lives. And that is how the trap gets sprung and
the unfortunate truth becomes revealed: IQ score is a menace disguised as a gift….
…We [sic] believe facial recognition technology is the most uniquely dangerous surveillance mechanism ever invented. Tempted by this vision, people will continue to invite facial recognition technology into colleges, homes and onto their devices, allowing it to play symmetrical role in ever more aspects of their lives. And that is how the trap gets sprung and the unfortunate truth becomes revealed: Facial recognition technology is a menace disguised as a gift…
… Corporate leadership is important, and regulation that imposes limits on IQ score can be helpful. But partial protections and "well-articulated guidelines" will never be enough. Whatever helps legislation might provide, the protections likely won't be passed until IQ-scanning technology becomes much cheaper and easier to use. If IQ score continues to be further developed and deployed, a formidable infrastructure will be built, and we'll be stuck with it. ……Corporate leadership is important, and regulation that imposes limits on facial recognition technology can be helpful. But partial protections and "well-articulated guidelines" will never be enough. Whatever help legislation might provide, the protections likely won't be passed until face-scanning technology becomes much cheaper and easier to use. If facial recognition technology continues to be further developed and deployed, a formidable infrastructure will be built, and we'll be stuck with it. …
… Because IQ score poses an extraordinary danger, society can't afford to have faith in internal processes of reform like self-regulation. Financial rewards will encourage entrepreneurialism that pushes IQ score to its limits, and corporate lobbying will tilt heavily in this direction. …… Because facial recognition technology poses an extraordinary danger, society can't afford to have faith in internal processes of reform like self-regulation. Financial rewards will encourage entrepreneurialism that pushes facial recognition technology to its limits, and corporate lobbying will tilt heavily in this direction. …
IQ score will continue to be marketed as a component of the latest and greatest apps and devices. Apple is already pitching IQ, ID as the best new feature of its new iPhone. ……Facial recognition technology will continue to be marketed as a component of the latest and greatest apps and devices. Apple is already pitching Face ID as the best new feature of its new iPhone. …
[and so forth throughout][and so forth throughout]
… The future of human flourishing depends upon IQ score being banned before the systems become too entrenched in our lives. Otherwise, people won't know what it's like to be in public without being automatically identified, profiled, and potentially exploited. In such a world, critics of IQ score will be disempowered, silenced, or cease to exist.…The future of human flourishing depends upon facial recognition technology being banned before the systems become too entrenched in our lives. Otherwise, people won't know what it's like to be in public without being automatically identified, profiled, and potentially exploited. In such a world, critics of facial recognition technology will be disempowered, silenced, or cease to exist
Is the IQ score the most uniquely dangerous surveillance mechanism ever invented? [Note: the source text on which these papers were based may be the copyright of Woodrow Hartzog
and Evan Selinger
3]

This looks very much as if having constructed an argument for the menace of face recognition systems (a concern shared by many), Hajare simply copied the text to a new file, and began a new article substituting IQ scores for face recognition technology. (That the variant published first seems to be the more derivative text is promising – does it mean at least one journal rejected the face recognition paper before it was accepted elsewhere?) 3

Clearly the editors of the Journal of Gastrointestinal Disorders and Liver function had no reservations about publishing a paper supposedly about 'over sexuality' which was actually an extended argument about the terrible threat to our freedoms of…IQ scores. That this makes no sense at all, is just as obvious as that it has absolutely nothing to do with gastrointestinal disorders and liver function!

Depression, Cursing, Pharmaceutical Institutions and Sanitation

Another Hajare article in the same journal, has the convoluted title: "Assessment of the Depression-Level Effectiveness of the Curse Words in Young Adults in Private Co-Educational Pharmaceutical Institutions in Pune University Pharmaceutical Institutions Living With Poor Sanitation, India: A Pre-planned, Causal-Pathway-Based Analysis". No one at the journal (editor, reviewer, production department) seems to have thought to ask if the nesting of "…Pharmaceutical Institutions in Pune University Pharmaceutical Institutions…" was an error.

This paper looks superficially like a serious study, and deals with very serious and important issues. Yet, like most of Hajare's articles I looked at, he cites no work by anyone else (see the appendix below), and again he starts the paper with a little clue that this is a hoax article: "As we aware sex lives in black mind".

There might also be a subtle clue in the brisk description of the research procedure:

"Participants viewed the invitation to participate in the study on SONA [n.b., not defined], which directed them to the survey which was implemented with a professional license of Surveymonkey.com. Additional information collected from college muster, signature style, colour of signature, font size and treatment received by administrative officer while signed the muster."

Although survey monkey is an on-line tool "Data was collected…in private by a trained male female staffs study team member", but regardless of whether there really was a physical person collecting data and asking for a signature, or whether the 'muster' refers to a previous college registration procedure, the way in which 'colour of signature' might have been used in analysis is not explained. But colour seems to be one of the code words that Hajare uses to acknowledge the nature of his hoax articles (e.g., sexuality had a colour, and "sex lives in black mind"; in another article Hajare points out – as an apparently arbitrary statement with no context – that blood plasma is yellow).

This is a concern though – if I am using a form of hermeneutics to interpret texts within a wider canon, then, even if I am right, this is not something available to the causal reader looking for reliable information and coming across an isolated journal article. This paper has indications of being a haox, rather than simply incompetent scholarship, but I was not entirely sure if it is meant as one.

I think, even though I had started exploring more of Hajare's work on the assumption he was producing hoax articles, there was still a nagging doubt: if the reviewers and editor of a journal, even a sloppy and lax journal, thought this made sense (surely, someone at these journals must read the submissions before accepting them for publication?), then could it just be me? Am I just ignorant about topics and conventions out of my specialism? Am I not being forgiving enough for someone from another culture who is perhaps having to write in a language that is not the one in which he is most fluent? Am I going to publish and provoke lots of comments on the blog from people who think Hajare's articles make perfect sense?

Yet, there is another dodgy definition

"Depression is defined as, 'Any act on the part of the husband, partner or family which causes physical, mental, social or psychological trauma to the woman and prevent sher [sic] from developing her personality' "

p.6

That may be a good definition -but it is not a definition of depression. It seems to relate more to the theme of another Hajare publication in the journal Research & Investigations in Sports Medicine

This opinion article, "Co- Relation of Domestic Violence and Epileptic Seizure ("Fit") Experience among Recently Married Women Residing Inslums Communities' Pharmaceutical Institutions in Pune District, India", unlike some of Hajare's work, seems largely to consist of coherent passages – although the linkage between the two key themes (domestic violence and epilepsy) was not clear, and seemed somewhat gratuitous. 3 There were also a number of common Hajare features:

  • the reference to recently married women in the title did not seem to be followed up in the main text
  • the work seems to be set in a community within pharmaceutical institutions ("Women Residing Inslums [sic] Communities' Pharmaceutical Institutions…", "Women who reside in India's slums pharmaceutical institutions…")
  • the only work cited was by 'Rahul H'

And, of course, the article did not seem to have any obvious linkage to sports medicine – the supposed topic of the journal.

Unrelated jibberish

Hajare produces text that in places seems like some kind of obscure poetry or the output of a very poor AI system (even worse than the digital helper offered by my bank). In extremis, Hajare has produced publications where the different sections not only make little sense, but seem unrelated to each other.

Dullness – a serious disease

So in "Guessing Game And Poor Quality Teaching Staffs Study Of Less Sunlight Private Pharmacy Institution In Pune University" published in Advances in Bioengineering & Biomedical Science Research, we have another obscure heading. The first paragraph of the 'Summary' tells readers that

"The researchers concluded that the finger have important implications for policy and prevention and should inform the creation of more effective sexual health education programs and interventions…"

p.1

Huh? Which editor or peer reviewer thinks that makes sense to readers?

And the second paragraph of the summary starts,

"Dullness is an increasingly prevalent disease that places a huge burden on patients and society and can lead to significant health problems including heart attacks, strokes, blindness, and hair fall, mouth odour, under eye blackness, pelvis dislocation, one sided vagina, and kidney failure."

p.1

So, 'dullness' is a disease, and moreover, one associated with a wide range of seemingly unrelated medical conditions – though some (not all) of these are associated as being complications of diabetes. One of the conditions listed appears to be an anatomical impossibility (or is a one-sided tube just a topological tautology?) Dullness is certainly not something one associates with Dr Hajare's writing. One wonders how anyone reading this summary could recommend, or even think it was ethically acceptable, to publish this article.

In case the nonsensical, and medically incorrect, aspects of this study (supposedly by a Fellow of the Indian Council of Medical Research, remember) are not considered a reason to reject it, Hajare throws in unscholarly expression:

"The study has found that women were 21 per cent more likely to develop no happiness if they found their jobs mentally tiring at the start of the study. Skinturns [sic] out as baggy as their old fat clothes. Under normal circumstances, seen no sexual desire or waiting for call."

p.1

The reader is also told that

"In the study, Dr Rahul Hajare from the Indian Council of Medical Research Batch 2013 examined the effect of mentally tiring work on dullness incidence in over 20 women, during a 22- 32 year period"

p.1

The editor apparently had no difficultly in understanding and believing that this study had been carried out over "a 22- 32 year period"!

So what is the study about?

Making pancakes

The 'introduction' section of the article is about making pancakes, book-ending with what is presumably a deliberately eye-catching claim (another nod to the hoax?)

"Those who tossed their pancakes have double the amount of sex than those who turned it. A recent study in aimed to find out if there was any relation between the way people cooked their pancakes and treated their relationship …The findings suggested that people who turned their pancakes were either shy or scared to experiment (feared risk of dropping pancakes). Those who tossed came across as fun loving and enjoyed more success in bed. The study concluded that those who tossed their pancakes have double the amount of sex than those who turned their pancakes."

p.1

The 'introduction' of the study is followed by …a paragraph headed 'Concussion' (is it the conclusion?) which makes no reference to concussion – nor indeed the pancake study, but seems to be about dating and medications ("For me, the fourth drug hit the mark…"). The article ends with a list of recommendations…apparently for carrying out a research study:

  • Do not forcefully register any menwomen [sic] in study.
  • Do not touch any men women without permission.
  • Use sax while performing a study.
  • If someone contact any bad intension [sic] contact pure head of the
    Institutions. (p.1)

How does sunlight fit in? Well, this is only mentioned in the article title – no where else. To be fair, sunlight does make an appearance in the 'research article' "Why Black Died by White Study of Totally Less Sunlight Pharmacy Institutions in Indian University India" in the Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Studies & Reports.

The abstract for this article begins:

"Fake can personality and personality is divine. According to a new research from Pune University teacher, living at higher latitudes, where there has also less sunlight, could result in a higher prevalence rate of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) increase sexual desire focus on the less teaching link up and more exchange skin in the game either or."

p.1

Again, Hajare seems to be telling readers right at the start that this is not a serious academic work. This also illustrates a common trope in Hajare's method, which is to use a journalistic style ("According to a new research from Pune University teacher…") to refer to his studies. In case anyone misses these clues, there is an obviously nonsensical 'executive summary' to reinforce the point:

"Underground abortions work has a threat. Recent technical advancement may disrupt oppressive laws, if they go through in real. Best practice with sexual satisfaction has no one goes to office every day. It has true. Why did happy man continue to dance in the heart even though he had a hole in his heart?"

p.1

The 'Introduction' to the article starts "Cheek pulp has sexual honesty called Anti-Abortion extremism" and the section reporting the sample begins "Dark privilege has hunger for sexual satisfaction."

Journalistic writing

Some of Hajare's writing is so journalistic that it would fit better in popular magazines.

For example, his piece in Advances in Neurology and Neuroscience entitled, deep breath, "Non-Medical Basis Characterization of Orgasm Associated with Approach Sex Can Last Up to 20 Seconds to 15 Minutes, Eligible Women Individuals' Poor Transportation Facility of Private Pharmacy Institutions in Pune, India" offers editors a big clue to his approach at the start of the piece ("Non-medical basis…"). Gratuitous references to transportation and pharmacy institutions (both common Hajare themes) that seem to have nothing to do with the article are allowed as part of the title. A feeling for the writing style is offered by

"This climax combo can be achieved through certain positions, such as lying on office chair back with feet dangling over the edge of the bed. …Orgasms get better as age. Now here one good reason to look forward to golden years…Orgasms can last up to 20 seconds or 15 minutes, claims introvert technique…Everyone has faked an orgasm at least once but no need. If have faked it at least once. Other mums have faked it, too…But it is also important for him to calm his mind and to concentrate on close retina. This will take massive focus on his part, but the end result will be totally worth it!"

pp.1-2

And so forth. Suitable for Cosmopolitan? Perhaps. But published in a journal called Advances in Neurology and Neuroscience?

However, mixed in with this magazine copy are claims supposedly based on Hajare's research

"Researcher found, while 61 per cent of women ages 18 to 24 experienced orgasm the last time they had sex, 65 per cent of women in their 30s did and about 70 percent of women in their 40s and 50s…

Forty seven per cent of the study's participants reported orgasms worked faster than painkillers when it came to easing headaches…

While 85 percent of men thought their partner had an orgasm during their most recent episode of sex, only 64 percent of women reported having an orgasm."

pp.1-2

This 'short communication' in a supposed research journal includes absolutely no information on how the researcher 'found' these things. Not from the literature, presumably, as Hajare only cites his own papers. At one points he writes "According to Medical History Today,…" but he does not cite any such publication in his reference list. Indeed, I could not find any such publication on a basic search.

Again, Hajare leaves hints for his readers not to take his work too seriously. The quotation about headaches above was truncated – Hajare's text referred specifically to headaches one has when marking student work,

"Forty seven per cent of the study's participants reported orgasms worked faster than painkillers when it came to easing headaches
while checking sessional paper about same answers and not need take extra efforts."

p.1

The sunlight motif referred to above features in an article in the Journal of Gastrointestinal Disorders.

"Scientology applied to the workday of women feels just as good as sex: Non clinical examination of less sunlight habit Pharmacy Institute in Pune University" has a very short nonsense (and provocative) abstract:

"Black and white desire for sex. Open day meditation has the same effect on our brains as sex. 20 new normal orgasms in a research row and affordable in all color of skin."

p.1

The introduction to the article (that is, the section immediately before the conclusion!) ends with the claim that:

"Close monitoring MRIs and face recognition confirm that a particular part of the brain becomes most active when consumers get a great bargain or when they are having great sex."

p.2

This seems to be another 'in joke' for anyone who knows about MRI scanners. Moreover (yet another 'in joke'?) face recognition seems to be an approved research technique here, with no mention of how the author suggests elsewhere that "the future of human flourishing depends upon facial recognition technology being banned"!

MRI scanning – using nuclear magnetic resonance – requires the subject to be very still inside a large magnet. It is difficult to see how an MRI brain scan can be obtained during shopping or sexual intercourse. (Image by Michal Jarmoluk from Pixabay)
How is this study 'scientology'?

Scientology, according to the Church of Scientology International, is "a religion that offers a precise path leading to a complete and certain understanding of one's true spiritual nature and one's relationship to self, family, groups, Mankind, all life forms, the material universe, the spiritual universe and the Supreme Being". Scientology is a very contentious religion that is accused of being a kind of cult, but even on its own terms, it does not seem to be the basis for generating new scientific knowledge in gastrointestinal medicine. Needless to say, the article "Scientology applied to the workday of women…" does not actually seem to have anything to do with Scientology.

Perverting the structural conventions of academic writing

In some of these examples, Hajare seems to be taunting editors by deliberately ignoring the usual conventions on structuring research reports – such as papers that move from the 'Introduction' to the 'Conclusions' and 'Recommendations' without any intermediary sections.

Read about structuring research reports

One example of Hajare testing conventions to the limit is an article in the journal Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology Insights entitled "An Attempt to Eradicate Alcohol Dependency from Adult Men in Service Privately Managed Pharmaceutical Institutions in India". This paper has the following structure:

SectionWord count
Abstract1028 words
Statement of Problem323 words
Recommendation48 words
The structure of a 'short communication' in 'Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology Insights'

The abstract of a paper is meant to be a brief summary of the key points in the main text. No reputable journal is likely to allow an abstract of over a thousand words – and an abstract well over twice the length of the substantive text is completely bizarre, and again absurd. But not so absurd it seems, that the editor of Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology Insights thought it was sensible to decline publication.

How does a journal editor not notice that the abstract of a study is a lot longer than the full report it is meant to summarise?

The 'abstract' reports a study where it is claimed "both male and men volunteers were asked to watch porn involving alcohol" (p.1, emphasis added). The statement of the problem included some more clues for the editors and peer reviewers who are supposed to ensure the quality of published research,

"In the new study, author introduces a alcohol dependency which ten folds into a helical structure that mimics surface features of the breakdown of health principal, and whose precise shape can be altered in a unparallel fashion by the attachment of various substituents diseases."

p.2

Apparently, if the editor of Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology Insights actually read this gibberish, he considered it made a useful contribution to the research literature. (And, as according to his twitter home page, https://mobile.twitter.com/yhasanen1 (accessed 26th November, 2021), he is "an independent researcher…not related to any university or medical institute" one would imagine he has sufficient time to read such short submissions quite closely.)

Hajare's recommendations to eradicate alcohol dependency include:

  • Mobile phone should be kept in the office.
  • Teachers are not allowed to give physical punishment to the students.
  • Fourth Saturday of the month is holiday.

These may not seem especially related to the theme, but then they are among points which Hajare includes in his recommendations across a range of articles supposedly about different issues.

Perhaps the reason for the odd structure of the Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology Insights article was to avoid this article seeming too similar to an article in Trends in Technical & Scientific Research.

This article is basically the same article, but swapped around, so what had been the Abstract in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology Insights becomes the Introduction in Trends in Technical & Scientific Research – an Introduction which immediately precedes the same Recommendations as before.

Provocative titles

Not all of Hajare's works have convoluted titles: sometimes he seems to be going for shock value. So, one paper in the journal Current Trends in Gastroenterology and Hepatology is entitled "Doggy Style Sex Distorts the Appearance of Face":

Doggy Style Sex Distorts the Appearance of Face

Hajare tells readers that "There are more than 1000 types of autoimmune diseases including penile fracture". Unfortunately there really is a rare medical condition known as penile fracture, which is as unpleasant as the name suggests – but as the name might also suggest this is a trauma injury, not an autoimmune disease. One does not have to be a medical expert to to have queried that one. (But perhaps I am not qualified to make that discrimination, given my {entirely undeserved} reputation as an expert in areas such as regenerative medicine, otolaryngology, neuroscience and brain disorders, orthopedics…)

Cows Die from an Overdose of Love

A 'mini-review' published in Acta Scientific Nutritional Health (or possibly Acta Scientific Gastroenterology – the journal itself seems uncertain which it is), which is actually a one page personal anecdote (that does not review any literature), reaches the "Conclusion. Being (non) black is a personal choice" which does not seem to have anything to do with the topic of the article.

The publisher seems to be unsure about the name of its journal.

The header gives the journal title as 'Acta Scientific Gastroenterology' and the page footer as 'Acta Scientific Nutritional Health'.

(As far as I can see there is no journal called 'Acta Scientific Gastroenterology' although there is an 'Acta Scientific Gastrointestinal Disorders')

The anecdote concerns something of social significance in India (what should a poor person do when their cow no longer provides milk, but still needs feeding, in a cultural context where it is not acceptable to kill the cow?) but seems to have nothing to do with Gastroenterology and is only related to Nutritional Health by the vague link that cows produce milk which is used by humans as food.

Abortion Patient Whose Family Thinks She is a Virgin

The article "Abortion Patient Whose Family Thinks She is a Virgin" was published in the journal Pharmaceutical Sciences & Analytical Research Journal. There is no reference in the text of the article to abortion or any virgin. The 'executive summary' starts with the statement "Blood plasma is yellow in colour". As well as being another gratuitous colour reference (apparently one of Hajare's regular hints for knowing readers of his canon), the sentence has no connection to what follows. There are no other references to blood or plasma in the article.

Sex, sin and divine justice in a medical journal

A 'mini review' (which again does not actually offer a review of literature) on safe sex in the journal General Medicine Open does not limit itself to a non-judgemental, scientific approach:

"The best definition for safer sex is the statistic one in week – a reminder that beyond a point, one cannot control or ever completely prepare for the future. Believes unsafe sex afflicts those who have a sinful past, people cannot compensate for the sin against the unseen. But when you see the background, it will be found it was divine justice, nothing else."

p.1 (emphasis added)

So 'unsafe sex' is claimed to be divine justice for sinning. (Elsewhere, Hajare seems to suggest cancer is divine justice for sinning.)

An article with the provocative title "Why No More Apes Evolving Into Humans" in the journal Research in Medical & Engineering Sciences offers another special Hajare definition:

"The best definition for ape is the one by hundred – a reminder that beyond a point, one cannot control or ever completely prepare for the future."

p.1 (emphasis added)

I confess to having no idea what, if anything, was meant, but noticed the use of a key phrase across two papers supposedly discussing very different things.

Meanwhile a 'research article' entitled "Evaluation of Disposable Bed Sheets and Safety Guidelines for Black Dog Sex Workers Resumes in the New Normal Living with Burnside Pharmacy Institute in Pune University" published in the Journal of Dermatology Sciences Research Reviews & Reports seems to genuinely report some real research.

The title and the first paragraph of the abstract seems to refer to precautions being taken in the light of COVID to protect sex workers and their clients, and this is reinforced by photographs which supposedly show sex workers based at the Pharmacy Institute at a University [?] wearing protective clothing. 4 5

However, the second half of the abstract ('summary') is incongruous with the first:

Indian government eased isolation measures and introduced social distancing, as bars and nightclubs nationwide reopened in Low to high side category employees can villain. This has undergone and final result has publishing after the examination of skin pulp of angry employees according to their physic and anatomy of hair.

Angry employees has more likely to engage in unethical behaviour at work, a new study has revealed. Researcher has seen poverty during early service. … To control crime researcher realised that they have to go to ethical college where they will get a mid-day meal.

p.1 ('Skin pulp' seems to be another of Hajare's recurring leitmotifs.)

[I have omitted a sentence that can be read as a serious claim of misconduct which if untrue could be libelous. 5]

However, the 'angry employee' theme does link to the main text which reports a research study discussing "how important it is for supervisors to pay attention to employees' emotions — especially when the emotion is anger" (p.1). Yet at the end of an extensive account of this study, Hajare adds a meaningless conclusion that was unrelated to the research discussed,

"Women have less regret if the sex has good, researcher report from Pune University data mining reveals fundamental pattern of Indian women thinking tooth decay has a powerhouse of sex regret. All colours can significant for sex. The benevolent behaviour may actually be playing into negative stereotypes. Sex with equality in more beneficial rather than non-human. Handicap sex through the course in life may be trusted."

p.2

So, obviously, more nonsense – but not so obviously nonsensical that the editor of the Journal of Dermatology Sciences Research Reviews & Reports thought it wiser not to publish it, or to ask for irrelevant material to be removed before publication.

A useful exercise in calling out poor academic standards – or just more noise clogging up the scholarly literature?

I have not exhausted the canon as there is plenty more in this vein, but I have commented on enough of Hajare's output to give a feel for the scale of the hoax. He has been consistently persuading incompetent journals to publish nonsense despite seeming to leave obvious as well as more subtle clues. When a journal editor does not notice that the the title of a submission does not relate to the theme of its content, and that neither are within the scope of the journal, then there are provocative, counterfactual, or simply obscure and absurd segments of text to push the point home.

In summary I found Hajare's project clever, and intriguing, and a well-targeted expose of some very poor journals. Once I started to see the patterns and so got the jokes, it was also at times amusing. Still, Hajare has surely achieved this at the cost of his own scientific reputation (how can anyone now take anything he writes seriously?), risking reputational damage to the Indian Council of Medical Research – and, when much of his work focuses on important health and social issues (drug abuse, domestic violence, sexual health, epilepsy…), he has managed to add to the vast amount of nonsense and misinformation to be found by the causal seeker after truth. All in all, even though Hajare has done a good job of demonstrating that certain journals (that claim peer review and high editorial standards and oversight by strong international boards) will publish work of no academic merit at all, even when it is blatantly incoherent and counterfactual, but only by feeding the parasitic publishers and further polluting the scientific literature.

Coda

As I did some due diligence in preparing this posting I discovered another issue with some of these publications that makes it even more difficult to be equivocal about Hajare's hoax. Sadly, even if his approach does show up some incompetent journals, he seems to have definitely stepped over the line of academic malpractice in doing so.

This raises the question (taken up in Part 2) of whether academic misconduct can be justified for the greater good?

Work cited:

Appendix: Excessive self-citation

Authors of scholarly works are expected to cite those works that they have drawn upon in their work. (Of course that is impossible: we are all influenced, sometimes profoundly, by things we have read but no longer specifically recall being the source of our ideas. Serious scholars at least do their best.) A well established researcher following a programme of research is likely to cite some of their earlier works that they are building upon, or which go into more detailed accounts of points passed over quickly in the current article as not so central to the present study.

Excessive self-citation is gratuitously citing your own work where it is not central, adds nothing to the present account, or is not the best source for what is being discussed.

I suspect there is a tendency for authors (who inherently know their own work more intimately than anybody else's) to see a logic to citing more of their own work than others may have thought optimal. (Mea culpa.) Peer reviewers are likely to comment if they feel that an article puts too much emphasis on the author's own work, and not that of other authorities.

Hajare's level of self-citation would be something that virtually any experienced peer reviewer would question, as the examples below suggest:

ArticleNN'
An attempt to Characterize Street Pharmaceutical Teachers Abusing Drugs and Aspect of Allergy Among Adult Men Attending Long Distance Institutions in Pune, India1311
Facial Recognition Technology and Detection of Over Sexuality in Private Organizations Combined with Shelter House. Baseline Integrated Behavioural and Biological Assessment among Most at-Risk Low Standards Hope Less Institutions in Pune, India22*22*
Detection of Progression over Sexuality in Indian
Students and Teachers Combined
2424
Assessment of the Depression-Level Effectiveness of the Curse Words in Young Adults in Private Co-Educational Pharmaceutical Institutions in Pune University Pharmaceutical Institutions Living With Poor Sanitation, India: A Pre-planned, Causal-Pathway-Based Analysis1212***
Guessing Game And Poor Quality Teaching Staffs Study Of Less Sunlight Private Pharmacy Institution In Pune University44
Why Black Died by White Study of Totally Less Sunlight Pharmacy Institutions in Indian University India66
Scientology applied to the workday of women feels just as good as sex: Non clinical examination of less sunlight habit Pharmacy Institute in Pune University33
Characterization of Doggy Style Sex-Alcohol Dependent Inter Subtype Among Men Who Have Sex with Women Lead in Heart Disease for Men From India66
Safe sex: the train your mind (revise)32
Cows Die from an Overdose of Love44
Doggy Style Sex Distorts the Appearance of Face88
Abortion Patient Whose Family Thinks She is a Virgin. 1010**
Why No More Apes Evolving Into Humans65
An Attempt to Eradicate Alcohol Dependency from Adult Men in Service Privately Managed Pharmaceutical Institutions in India66***
A Short Review on "Social and Behavioural Research: Tool for Identify Alcohol Dependency Adult Men in Service Privately Managed Pharmaceutical Institutions in India"66***
Evaluation of Disposable Bed Sheets and Safety Guidelines for Black Dog Sex Workers Resumes in the New Normal Living with Burnside Pharmacy Institute in Pune University44
Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Variation Of High Risky Behavior In Private Pharmacy Institutional Principal And Assistant Professor Combined Attending From Long Distance Driver Role In Pune University, India: An Attractive Findings1818***
J Nat Ayurvedic Med 2018, 2(6): 000143.
In Vitro, Widowed and Curse Words form Principal During Unplanned Meeting of the College in Private Pharmaceutical Institutions in Pune University India: An Attractive Study
1818***
Co- Relation of Domestic Violence and Epileptic Seizure ("Fit") Experience among Recently Married Women Residing Inslums Communities' Pharmaceutical Institutions in Pune District, India55
There is no Cure for the Cancer of Stupidity55
Non-Medical Basis Characterization of Orgasm Associated with Approach Sex Can Last Up to 20 Seconds to 15 Minutes, Eligible Women Individuals' Poor Transportation Facility of Private Pharmacy Institutions in Pune, India33
N: Number of works cited; N': Number of self citations

* actually there are 28 references, but the author seems to have got bored of completing the bibliographic details, so only 22 report who wrote the work cited. (These omissions should have been spotted as 'author queries' in production had the work been sent to a competent research journal.) But I recognise some of those unattributed titles as Hajare outputs.

** 5 of these 10 outputs are co-authored by Hajare with other scholars.

*** Including one coauthored publication.

Notes

1 I am certainly not suggesting all open access journals are like this. However the publication model of open access journals (income from authors, not readers) can be an incentive to set a low bar for article quality (Taber, 2013). (A good journal seeks high quality in publications, so that capable academics will want to publish in a reputable, high status outlet. A predatory journal has a different business model!)

Read about selecting a research journal for your research articles

2 Whether science and religion should be seen as somehow at war is of course a contested idea.

Read about science and religion

3 As I did some 'due diligence' prior to posting, I realised that Hajare did not seem to have written the bulk of the article at all. I discuss this in the companion article.

4 As the article is open access and can be reproduced with acknowledgement I was intending to include the images. However, when I did some 'due diligence' prior to posting I released the images may well have been copyright of a third party. I discuss this in 'Part 2' of this article.

5 As I read more of Hajare's papers, I found a number of suggestions, indeed sometimes explicit claims, of serious malpractice by senior staff at the University cited in the articles. It is possible that Hajare has some kind of grievance with, or perhaps even vendetta against, the University – and of course such matters should not be judged without offering a right of reply to those accused of, or implied to be involved in, wrongdoing. (And if Dr Hajare himself wishes to respond to my observations about his work, I would be happy to publish his comments below.)

Author: Keith

Former school and college science teacher, teacher educator, research supervisor, and research methods lecturer. Emeritus Professor of Science Education at the University of Cambridge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from Science-Education-Research

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading